Category Archives: The Closet On The Right

Left's Long March

The Left’s Long March Resumes [Guest Post]

Weaponizing government entities returns, with a vengeance

Antonio Gramsci believed that the path to the seizure of state power was not through violent revolution, like the Communist Revolution of a century ago, but through “becoming State.” Marxist revolutionaries would become the state by taking over the institutions of the state.
This plan/concept would become more familiar by Rudi Dutchke’s phrase for it, “the long march through the institutions.”

In today’s Twitterverse, the long march has been captured accurately by Iowahawk:


Midterms over, members of a newly-empowered Democrat House majority have made no secret of resuming their attack on our Republic from the institutions that comprise it.

Congressman Adam Schiff, soon to replace Congressman Devin Nunes as head the House Intelligence Committee, is wasting no time signaling his intention to use his committee to attack the Trump presidency and cripple its ability to conduct foreign policy.

He intends to use his position not only to end ongoing investigations into Democrats’ misconduct but to pivot and attack, using the subpoena powers of his committee within the institution of the House of Representatives as his castle from which to demand respect.

What can’t be co-opted (in this case, the executive branch), they will destroy.

The Plan

Adam Schiff
Credit: imgflip.com
His plan is about twisting the emoluments clause into an unrecognizable form.
With the help of the “mainstream” media, Democrats intentionally confuse the American people to undermine a President because they lost the election.
Indeed, Democrats publicly plan to display their “resistance” files by weaponizing the House on this issue; and multiple others across other committees in a non-stop assault on this President to destroy the executive branch’s ability to govern.

Contrast this to the out-of-bounds efforts to expand his predecessor’s executive power, even extraconstitutionally on multiple occasions, and one gets the new Democrat modus operandi: co-opt or destroy.
They will mangle them emoluments clause into nothingness; just like they desire to do with the electoral college, redistricting, state power, the US Constitution, etc.


The Middle Eastern Re-alignment

Iran Nuclear Deal
Credit: jtf.org
President Trump has done a lot in the Middle East to help realign its power structures away from radical Islamists and toward moderates, reversing Obama’s policies of tipping the scales towards the radicals.

  • Through ending the Iran “nuclear deal.”
  • Standing up to Iranian saber-rattling
  • Calling them out in front of the world at the UN
  • Supporting our historical allies
  • Snubbing our adversaries once again
  • Recognizing the capital of Israel
  • Moving the US Embassy there, etc.,

Thus, the President has made it clear US leadership is back and leading from the front.

Libya: A Warning to Islamic Dictators


The sad reality of international relations in the Middle East is that there are no good guys, just less bad ones.

Democrats have put their marker down in defense of the Muslim Brotherhood and in the overturning of friendly regimes.
Credit: IMREDIFFMAIL



Libya is an excellent example of a multi-decade diplomatic success story turned lesson for pro-western, Middle-Eastern dictators.

Libya had disarmed and ended its nuclear program and turned in all its nuclear materials. The payback: A bombing of Libya that ultimately resulted in the ouster and murder of its leader, Gaddafi.

Libya and Gaddafi could not be used for Democrat purposes, so he was destroyed. Consequently, leaving behind a weak central government and an environment for terror and chaos to thrive.
The lesson for the region’s dictators: Comply with the west and die.

Later, Libya was used to run weapons through to Syria at Benghazi, enabling the rise of ISIS, but we won’t talk about that…

Tilted Public Perception


Notice that its perfectly fine for his predecessor, President Obama, to order the killings of civilians, and oversee the removal of heads-of-state.
He also overlooked the political murders of hundreds of thousands across the Middle East.
His administration halt investigations into/prosecution of Hezbollah (a terrorist organization) operatives running cocaine and heroin through the United States.
Next, he used the proceeds to purchase weaponry (tacitly funding a terrorist organization by knowingly not halting it, undermining the DEA) because doing so threatened the Iran capitulation, er…nuclear “deal”, pursuing an unconstitutional treaty with that terror state, etc…

That’s all above board.

We won’t even get into the targeting of American citizens via the IRS, via FISA court abuses.
Or the weaponization of our intelligence agencies, and gaslighting an entire nation using non-existent Russian collusion to influence the 2016 election.
We now know this is a cover for Democrats’ collusion with Russians to do the same via a “dossier” of “salacious, unverified” information paid for by the DNC and the Hillary campaign.
Credit: level9news.com

Nor will we delve into the Clinton Foundation’s complete sellout of American technological secrets.

According to the FBI via the Skolkovo project, the Clinton Foundation received large donations immediately after the selling of American uranium to Russian.
Meanwhile, Hillary was Secretary of State and influencing American corporations to participate; or the use of a private e-mail server to conduct classified business.  Seventeen of the twenty-one businesses who participated also left massive contributions to the CF.

Nah. No influence peddling there.

No serial violations of the (re-interpreted on the fly) Espionage Act.

That too is above board. Democrats did it; it has to be!


Cooperate or Destroy


Instead, Democrats will attempt to destroy an emerging alliance between a moderating Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Israel against hardline Iran, Turkey, Syria; using the guise of Saudi officials staying at Trump-branded properties when conducting official business.
Nevermind that the President had passed off control of his business holdings to others.
They will even try to leverage a potential political assassination by another nation to do so.
President Trump must not be allowed to shape foreign policy; his business activities must be criminalized to prevent it.

You see, only Democrats are allowed to wield power.
Democrats use their offices to enrich themselves from American technological secrets and national security assets.
They overlook a terror network destroying the lives of Americans, so as not to threaten a nuclear capitulation to a terror state at war with the United States. 

Nothing will be allowed to get in the way of the Democrat totalitarian gang including:
  • The American people in selecting Trump as their president (we’re enemies of the republic for doing so).
  • A qualified nominee for the Supreme Court
  • Governors lawfully redistricting after years of census results.
  • A growing economy where taxpayers keep the fruits of their labor.
  • Election deadlines or voter eligibility.
  • Laws allowing states to clean their voter rolls.
  • The election system itself (in favor of a national popular vote to destroy our republic for a direct democracy).
  • The Bill of Rights, the separation of powers doctrine, nor the rest of the Constitution.

Congressman Schiff’s promised “investigation” is but a small part of this larger effort.  The executive branch (thus the American people’s choice to run it) could not be co-opted; so it must be destroyed, using other governmental institutions. Take notice as the media promotes and cheerleads all of it, under cover of “press freedom”.
In liberty,
Scott Kormanyos
Romanticizing China

Romanticizing Communism

Media Outlets are Promoting Communism

Communism in China
Credit: NYT The Land that Failed to Fail

It was a casual Sunday.   My daughter had another grueling two-hour volleyball practice that I use to catch up on whatever project I’m working on at the moment.

Naturally, a lot of scrolling happens during these practices.  During my snoozefest scrolling sesh, I saw it.

An NYTimes Article is romanticizing “Communist” China. Inappropriately titled, “The Land that Failed to Fail.”

Now, this is the second time in recent months I’ve seen a magazine article romanticizing the concept of Communism.  The last time was Teen Vogue of all places.


A growing discontent for capitalism and a resurgence of Communism or “Democratic Socialism” (as some on the Left like to use as a disguise for Communism) is spreading in the United States.

Let’s focus on this one particular article about the success of Chinese Communism though.  It says,

In the uncertain years after Mao’s death, long before China became an industrial juggernaut, before the Communist Party went on a winning streak that would reshape the world, a group of economics students gathered at a mountain retreat outside Shanghai.

The article goes on to boast the massive growth of China’s economy in the past 40 years as some Communist Christmas Miracle.  This miracle defied all odds and didn’t fail when everyone said it would.

Why is this article idolizing Communism as some socioeconomic beacon of success?

Seriously? Has this writer ever been to China?

Every nation that attempts Communism fails, including China.  The only thing remaining in China that is Communist is the political party that should have but didn’t abandon the name after it failed.

Don’t believe me?  Let’s look at some history and most importantly, some facts.

A Brief History

Communist China
Image Credit: Ron Paul Liberty Report

Mao Zedong defeated the existing Chinese regime in 1949.

Immediately after, he brought true, authentic Communism to the people of China.

Communism is not Love.

Communism is the hammer which we use to crush the enemy. -Mao Zedong

His first order of business was equally distributing all land among the people.

Next, he centralized all means of production under the control of the state.  Agriculture shifted to a system of collective farming.

Landlords and capitalists were suppressed and stripped of all property and wealth.

Mao’s Great Leap Forward was a massive failure that led to famine and death of its citizens.  This failure inevitably led to Mao tightening his grip on the population.  Any critics of his radical ideology were imprisoned or killed.

Political powers grows out of the barrel of a gun. -Mao Zedong

The Communist reign of Mao ultimately led to the death of up to 80 million people and China was only freed of the tyranny in 1976 when he finally died.

Communism did fail in China.  What is left does not even remotely resemble Communism.

Since the NYT author failed to examine the facts, we took the liberty to do it for him.

The Ten Planks of Communism

Ten Planks of Communism

Let’s look at the ten basic tenets of Communism.

  1. Abolition of Property in Land and Application of all Rents of Land to Public Purpose.

  2. A Heavy Progressive or Graduated Income Tax.

  3. Abolition of All Rights of Inheritance.

  4. Confiscation of the Property of All Emigrants and Rebels.

  5. Centralization of Credit in the Hands of the State, by Means of a National Bank with State Capital and an Exclusive Monopoly.

  6. Centralization of the Means of Communication and Transport in the Hands of the State.

  7. Extension of Factories and Instruments of Production Owned by the State, the Bringing Into Cultivation of Waste Lands, and the Improvement of the Soil Generally in Accordance with a Common Plan.

  8. Equal Liability of All to Labor. Establishment of Industrial Armies, Especially for Agriculture.

  9. Combination of Agriculture with Manufacturing Industries; Gradual Abolition of the Distinction Between Town and Country by a More Equable Distribution of the Population over the Country.

  10. Free Education for All Children in Public Schools. Abolition of Children’s Factory Labor in its Present Form. Combination of Education with Industrial Production.

Now Let’s Compare with China

  1. Abolition of private property- Nope.  You can own a home in China.  Granted, you don’t own the land it is on, but real estate is a booming industry in China. By a Marxist definition, the land is not used solely for the public purpose.  In fact, the state issues 70 year leases on land
  2. A Heavy Progressive Income Tax- Again, not even close.  The tax rate for most Chinese is lower than many countries like Japan and the Nederlands.
  3. Abolition of Rights of Inheritance- Wrong again.  Here is the Law of Succession in the Peoples’ Republic of China.
  4. Confiscation of Emigrants and Rebels- Partially correct.  Foreigners can own a home in China as long as they have lived in the country for 12 consecutive months.  Although, I’m not sure why anyone would want to.
  5. Centralization of Credit, Banks, Capital, etc.- 

    Noooooooope.  There are privately owned banks in China.  The government stifles their businesses with regulations, restriction of assets and laws, but they exist.

  6. Centralization of Means of Communication and Transportation- No.  Independent and privately owned transportation and communication exist.  It was previously under State control. However, this was one of the economic reforms implemented in the 80’s and 90’s. It must be stated that the media, the internet and other forms of communication are heavily supervised by the State though.
  7. Production/Means of Production Owned by the State- No. The transition away from SOE (state-owned enterprise) was one of the first economic reforms of the 80’s and 90’s when China was removing the layers of Communism from their economy. In fact, the private sector was responsible for 70% of the economic growth once China was free from Communism.
  8. Equal Liability To Labor- Borderline accurate.  China does command one of the world’s most massive armies. However, in terms of Marxism, China does not meet these requirements any longer.
  9. Combination of Agricultural and Manufacturing Industries; In other words, the elimination of class separation- Definitely not.  There is a pretty significant distinction between wealth and class in China.  The nation of China boasts an impressive 476 BILLIONAIRES. The only country that beats them is the United States.
  10. Free Education- Yes and no.  State-owned and operated are the preferred secondary education.  However, they are incredibly competitive.   Also, there are fees and tuition costs, but China’s student debt is virtually non-existent.

What Remains of Communism in China

Above all, China has maintained a strong and authoritative position over the population.

Recently, China increased their interference in the privacy of their citizens with new technology.  Their new surveillance technology monitors each person using facial recognition.  Citizens are rewarded or penalized based on day-to-day behaviors that include small things such as manners, to others such as smoking.  

Citizens in good standing receive additional privileges, while others not in good standing experience fines and even travel restrictions.

Yikes.  No thank you.

Freedom of speech is not a thing in China, either.

Due process? Well, it’s gotten better over the years, but the Chinese are known for imprisoning its people for virtually anything.

Example: An Author was recently sentenced to ten years in prison for writing about a gay sex scene in a book.

Religious persecution is common in China, and they are also a very nationalistic nation. (Think about their Olympic team.  Zero diversity. ZERO.)

Google is currently under intense scrutiny from its employees for agreeing to work with the Chinese government to spy on and control internet usage for its population.

When you look closely, China has more in common with Fascism than Communism at this point. (Don’t tell Liberals, they’ll lose their minds)

Final Nail in the Coffin of Communism in China

Karl Marx’s utopian vision for society relied on the elimination of the bourgeois.  In his mind, societies that exploited the proletariat were evil and must be abolished.

The exchange of labor for a wage, in his mind, was modern day slavery. To reverse this evil system, he believes the State should distribute land equally and create a nation where no one man has anything more than any other.

Sit down, Lefties. I’m about to burst your bubble.

Currently, in China, their entire economy is driven by and relies upon the proletariat. China’s economy has thrived by creating mass-produced exportable goods at prices lower than any other country in the world.

Unfortunately for the Communist, China has been able to lift more people out of poverty by eliminating Communism and implementing Capitalism.

Furthermore, I challenge any Communist, Socialist or Leftist to prove me wrong.

Until then, do yourself a favor and stop romanticizing Communism in articles that you write on your MacBook Pro from your high rise New York City offices.

#WalkAway DC March MAGA Hats

The Case for Gay Republicans

Gay Republicans are Real

Many on the Left gasp in horror when they meet Gay Republicans.  Somehow, being gay became synonymous with being a raging Liberal.

I’m not a raging Liberal.  In fact, I never have been. I flirted with the Left briefly after I “came out”, but I ended up running back to the Right once I realized I wasn’t obligated to be there.

This concept was simple for me to understand.  I didn’t agree with Liberals on anything aside from gay marriage, so why would I base my vote on a Democrat on one issue?

However, this is considered a cardinal sin in the LGBT world.

It doesn’t have to be.  Here’s why.

The LGBT Community Needs A Strong Economy Too

It’s pretty hard to U-Haul on the second date if you don’t have enough money to buy or rent a house.

Economic prosperity means you and your partner, regardless of what you “identify” as, will have the money to do the things you want to do.

Voting Democrat because you support LGBT rights, also means you’re voting for higher taxes, more government regulations, and weaker economies.

There are other policies that come along with your vote for the Left.

Your Democrat Congressman may support your right to change your gender on your driver’s license, but he also supports legislation that suffocates businesses.

 

If you can’t put food on your table, does it really matter what your license says?

It may to you, but you can’t employ thousands of people with your gender designation.

Open Borders are Bad for Everyone

Being gay does not mean you are obligated to save the world.

In fact, open borders is a terrible idea for the LGBT community because many of the people who want to flood here, punish gays in their native countries with the death penalty.

Allowing anyone to come here without vetting and due process puts our culture, our way of life and our government at risk.

If these people are unwilling to assimilate to American culture, they will bring their archaic beliefs with them.  They will elect people who represent those beliefs.  Those Representatives will influence legislation and ultimately, you.

Linda Sarsour, a prominent Muslim activist for the Democratic Party is vocally anti-Semitic and pro-Sharia Law.  For some reason, she is the poster child for Liberal tolerance and diversity.

However, if she were to get her way and Sharia Law ruled America; women would be oppressed, gays would be executed, and the LGBT community would be forced underground once again.

Ever wonder why there are no Muslims in the Republican Party?  Islam promotes traditional family structure, opposes abortion and much like the Christians, are devout to their God.  It would actually make MORE sense for the Muslims to run under a Republican ticket, right?

Wrong.  Their fundamental beliefs directly contradict American values and rule of law.

Nationalism does not always equal racism.  Racism does not always require Nationalism.

Promoting Nationalism means that you want the people of your country to be taken care of first.

If you’re gay, straight, black, white, Hispanic etc and are a citizen of this nation, that applies to you.

Embrace it.  Cherish it. Protect it.

The 2nd Amendment Applies to Everyone

Gay RepublicansThe LGBT was the victim of violence for many years. (Ironically, now it’s conservatives.)

Do you think if Matthew Shepherd had been armed that night in Wyoming, he would have been beaten to death?  Absolutely not.

Communities who arm themselves remove victimhood from their lives.

Buy a gun, learn how to use it and change the script of our story.  Being gay does not mean you have to be a victim, ever.

Everyone has the right to protect themselves.

Abortion is Murder

Last time I checked, gay people didn’t have to worry about unwanted pregnancy.

In fact, many gay and lesbian couples would gladly take any unwanted baby and raise them in a loving family.

Your sexuality does not mean you have to support someone else’s irresponsibility.

Life is precious and if you are a gay couple who have to pay thousands of dollars to build your family, you should protect it all costs.

If that doesn’t change your mind, watch a video of an abortion being performed.

It will break your heart, turn your stomach and traumatize you for life.

Finally, Gay Marriage is Settled

The Supreme Court ruled on gay marriage.  We’ve established the precedence and overturning it would be very difficult.  Justice Brett Kavanaugh confirmed this ruling during his confirmation process.

When pressed on the issue of Gay Marriage, he stated that the Supreme Court had already ruled on the treatment of homosexual people.

Gays for TrumpThe Republican Party has moved on, so should you.

In fact, almost all of the bigotry, homophobia, and hate I’ve experienced since I came out was from the Left.

Shocked?

You shouldn’t be.  The Democrats have a long and violent history of hate, racism, and discrimination.

It wasn’t until the 1950’s when they figured out the minority vote is a powerful tool.  They’ve been pushing the oppressed and victim platform ever since.

In reality, most Democrats opposed gay marriage for most of their careers. If you think they suddenly care about you now, I have a bridge to sell you.

Just Be An American

Ultimately, the Republican party doesn’t care your race, religion or orientation if you love and protect your country.

Take a look at what you stand for.  What you really stand for, not for what they tell you to stand for.  Are the Democrat solutions really what is best for yourself and this country?

Talk to a conservative or many.  How do they treat you?

Furthermore, disagree with a liberal.  See how they treat you.

We need to stop defining ourselves by singular issues like race, orientation or gender.  We are so much more than that and at the end of the day, you’re just as human as anyone else.  If you take the “gay” out of your identity for one minute, would you still vote the same?

It’s okay to identify with ALL the things that make you, you.  Stop allowing the Democratic Party to hold you hostage because of identity politics.

You deserve better.

 

The Gay Republican movement is growing stronger by the day.  We’re ready for you to join us.

Are you a Gay Republican and want to show your Pride and your Party?!  Check out the Closet on the Right Shop!

 

Pro-Choice

The Bittersweet Irony of The Pro-Choice Movement

The Pro-Choice Debate

The issue of Pro-Life vs. Pro-Choice continues to be a contentious topic in America, even to this day.  Democrats reignited the debate during the debacle known as the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation circus.  With a conservative justice tipping the scales in favor of Republicans, Roe v Wade is once again in jeopardy.

Liberals have convinced themselves that Republicans not only care whether or not they reproduce but also think we want to force them to do so.  By overturning Roe v Wade, their “reproductive rights” will evaporate.  Or so they want you to believe.

It’s Not About Choice Anymore

A woman has a right to choose what happens with her body, right? Her body, her choice.

Pro-Choice AdvocateNo one should force a woman into motherhood if she’s not ready.  It’s the responsible thing to do, right?

Unfortunately, the Pro-Choice movement has evolved into the Pro-ABORTION movement.  It’s not just about a woman’s right to choose any longer.

Now, getting an abortion is a badge of honor.  It’s a sign of defiance against the evil conservative Republicans and their traditional family values.

They’re convinced that we care so much about them having babies that are willing to commit self-genocide out of spite.  According to activists, abortion is the rare fix for rape, incest, life-threatening situations or the occasional lapse of judgment.

Instead, women can now choose to terminate a pregnancy as late as her due date in some states.

The Irony

By committing self-genocide out of what seems to be spite, Liberals are ensuring that the coming generation will likely be the most conservative generation we’ve seen in decades.  In fact, a recent study found that U.S birthrates have hit a 30 year low, well below the replacement level.

Now, I for one am grateful that fewer children are being born into terrible situations.  No sane person would want a child born into an abusive home or end up in the system.
If an early-term abortion prevents this, I can support that.  Ideally, avoiding pregnancy in the first place would be the best choice, but that doesn’t always happen.

They don’t realize this, but liberals are leaving the future of this country up to Republicans.  (Shhhhhh, don’t tell them)

Many celebrities have even jumped on the Shout Your Abortion bandwagon.  Yes, an entire website and a book are coming out of people “shouting their abortions.”

Ultimately, liberals are reducing their voice to a dull roar in America.

To which I say, good.  The “participation trophy” generation is crippling this country.

We Can Still Save Our Country

Republicans, the responsibility of keeping America alive is resting on our shoulders.

Considering the Left wants to destroy American values, let’s be grateful they’re protesting themselves into extinction.  The last thing we need is another generation of entitled, victimized activists who don’t respect our country.

As long as the liberals continue to think we want them to have children, they will do everything they can not to.

In one hand, we value the life of the unborn.  In the other, we value the preservation of our values.  The bittersweet irony is not lost on me, and I hope it’s not lost on you either.

In the meantime; continue raising hard-working, freedom-loving patriots and we can continue to Make America Great.

 

Trump Should Troll the U.N with a Gay Ambassador

Nikki Haley Breaks the Heart of America

Nikki Haley rocked the Republican community this morning when news broke that President Trump accepted her resignation. Haley, known for being bold and unapologetic, has frequently called out other countries for hypocrisy or injustices. Unfortunately for us, Haley will be leaving her post just short of two years as U.N Ambassador.

Hopefully, Nikki Haley will find herself in an even better position within the Trump administration. Her career has been nothing short of inspiring for women all around the country, and we can only hope she continues to serve our country in some capacity.

In the meantime, Trump now has an opportunity to do what he does best; Troll the Left.

The Next U.N Ambassador (We Hope)

May we present you with the next (we hope) U.N Ambassador, Richard Grenell.

Grenell is currently serving as the Ambassador to Germany. His nomination came from the one and only Donald J. Trump.

“Well of course he did,” says the Left, “He’s a white guy.”

Yes, he is, but he is also the only openly gay Republican serving as an ambassador. By nominating Rick Grenell to be the US Ambassador to the U.N, President Trump would be reaching epic levels of trolliness.

And that’s something we can get behind all day.

So Much Trolling

Not only will the Left’s wheel of oppression fall off its gears, but now homophobic nations will be face to face with someone they usually throw off a building.

It’s no secret that the Left wants to pain our POTUS as a homophobic, racist, xenophobic bigot. The problem is, he keeps destroying that narrative almost weekly.

Just last week he nominated a black man for surgeon general and not long before that, he appointed the first black female general in the Marines.

It’s about time we put the homophobic claims to rest as well. Choosing Rick Grenell would help nicely.

Next, despite the love that the Left has for Muslim countries, these are places that still openly target their gay citizens. Just last month, Indonesia “spared” two lesbians of 100 lashes and opted for “rehabilitation” instead.

Imagine being one of these countries who punish homosexuals and considers such a person guilty of a crime. Now they are face to face with an individual who, in their country, would be stoned to death. Ouch.

Not only that but many of the more progressive countries like the UK and Germany will undoubtedly see this as a step in the right direction for the US. However, these are also countries that have opened their borders and tolerate the invasion of Muslim refugees into their communities.

Everyone grab their popcorn. We would see a trinity of Presidential trolling unfold on a global stage.

#WalkAway

#WalkAway Gets Unexpected Boost From SCOTUS Circus

Democrats Help #WalkAway…again

Congressional Democrats helped to form an unlikely alliance last week.  Their showing at the Supreme Court nomination helped wake up quite a few more Americans who joined the #WalkaAway Campaign.

 

 

In yet another polarizing issue, the accusation of Christine Blasey Ford set the country on fire.  Despite the complete lack of evidence, Democrats threw their support behind Ford.  The #MeToo shot to the top of “trending” on Twitter with a new one for good measure; #IBelieveHer.

Meanwhile, Republicans and Conservatives approached the issue with skepticism and doubt.  “Why,” you ask? Well, let’s look at the facts.

The Evidence (Or Lack Of)

  1. She doesn’t remember when or where the party was.
  2. She doesn’t remember how she got there or how she got home.
  3. Her recollection of the account and who was there had changed multiple times.
  4. Everyone who “was at the party” according to Ford has denied they were either there or that it ever happened.
  5. She claims she fled the party after the attack and ran home (but wait, I thought she didn’t remember how she got home).  However, she also said she called her best friend from her cell phone after the attack.  The year was 1982.  The first cell phone wasn’t available for purchase until 1984.
  6. She claims she heard people talking about her/the attack at the party. (But she said she fled after the assault, so how is this possible)

There are also conflicting stories in regards to how she remembered the offense later in counseling.

According to Ford, she was remodeling her home and wanted a second door installed so she “could escape” and was claustrophobic after the alleged attack.  This remodel was for a rental property, and all of this occurred in 2008, not 2012 as she claimed.

Also sketchy…

Dr. Ford deleted ALL her social media profiles before sending the letter.

Holton Arms scrubber her yearbooks from the internet, but someone found them and saved them first. **MIC DROP**

For starters, she’s a far-left activist who had pictures on her social media accounts in a Pink Women’s March hat with a sign that says “Not My President.”

Allegedly, a former Facebook friend saw a post where she was bitter about then-Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorusch.  In the post, she states that someone should accuse him of rape to block the nomination.  When the friend replied it was unethical to destroy an innocent mans’ life over false accusations, she replied “So.” (This is allegedly and sent by a tweet.  It has NOT been confirmed, however, so take it with a grain of salt.)

Next, her yearbooks detail racist, alcohol-fueled weekends at Holton Arms.  Sexual encounters with boys were not only frequent, but they also bragged about them.  Lovely.

There’s MUCH more.  Maybe in another article. Let’s keep moving.

Political Chess

Many people believe Dr. Christine Blasey Ford.  They think that something happened to her.  It just wasn’t Brett Kavanaugh who did it.

Senator Diane Feinstein received this letter back in July.  She decided to sit on it until the 11th hour of the confirmation process.

Then, as if by magic, the letter gets leaked to the public and Dr. Ford’s request to remain anonymous was ignored.  The Democrats sprung into action to not only destroy one man’s life but their “victim’s” as well.

Senator Chuck Schumer publicly promised to block this Supreme Court nomination.

“I will oppose Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination with everything I have, and I hope a bipartisan majority will do the same. The stakes are simply too high for anything less.” – Senator Chuck Schumer

Before they announced a nominee, the Democrats had signs printed opposing all the top nominees before one was named.

The entire confirmation process was a complete circus with the interviews being interrupted about every fifteen minutes.

That was all before the accusation was even released.

 

Brett KavanaughDuring the Ford/Kavanaugh testimony, it was made clear that Senator Feinstein and her staff hired the attorneys for Dr. Ford.

The line of questioning to Judge Kavanaugh was hardly questioning at all.  It was a collaborated effort by Senate Dems to bully the judge into withdrawing his nomination and agreeing to an FBI investigation.

The circus continued, and as the proceedings went on, it became more and more clear that this was, in fact, a political hit job.  It was a calculated character assassination of a man who spent his entire life defending our Constitution so that he could watch it get desecrated in his name.

The Wake-Up Call

This embarrassing show of the Democrats weaponizing the #MeToo for political gain was the last straw for many.

It was disgusting and embarrassing.  Many feel bad for not just Judge Kavanaugh but Dr. Ford as well.  The blatantly obvious politically motivated seek and destroy was exactly what many on the left needed to call it quits with the Democrats.


 

I can do this all day.  These were just at the top of the search results.  There are many, many more.  Check for yourself.

Good job, Democrats.  Not only did you add fuel to the supposed “Russian Bot” #WalkAway Campaign, but you also may have just destroyed your mid-terms.

So on behalf of all of us in the #WalkAway Campaign, we want to thank you AGAIN for your support.  We couldn’t do it without you.

Now get back out there and screw up some more stuff.  We have the #WalkAway March coming up soon!

 

Click Below to Join us on Facebook!!

Facebook Censorship Gamble

Facebook Censorship: Playing with $2B of Fire

Facebook Censorship

Facebook Censorship Is Getting Worse

You’re playing with fire, Facebook.  The censorship of Conservative voices is becoming more obvious every day.  You have yet to ban a left-leaning or liberal person by “mistake”.  Or at least I haven’t heard of one.

 

So far, it has happened to Brandon Straka, PragerU, David Harris Jr, Diamond and Silk, and Candace Owens.  Without fail, (and once the media gets ahold of it) the ban ultimately gets lifted and an apology is issued.  It’s dismissed as a “mistake”.  This doesn’t even include the thousands of regular users who get thrown in “Facebook Jail” for stupid things.

 

Facebook’s own employees confess that inside their own walls exists a “political monoculture“.  Even further, former employees admit that Conservative stories and media outlets are suppressed regularly.  Despite his testimony in front of Congress, Mark Zuckerberg continues to allow censorship on his platform.

 

With 2.219 billion Facebook users worldwide, they beat out every other platform with ease. This also means they have the most to lose.

The Conservative Price Tag

Let’s just run through some statistics real quick:

Ultimately, we have to assume 10% is the same for businesses since I couldn’t find statistics to say otherwise.

Total Revenue of Facebook: $40.7 Billion x 10% = $4.7 Billion earned from the United States.

$4.7 Billion Dollars x 43% (Conservative Users) = $2,068,000,000

In other words, Facebook could lose $2 Billion (with a B) by censoring their Conservative users.  

The Snowball Effect

Digital Marketing 101: Go where your audience is.

If 43% of my audience is on Twitter instead of Facebook, I’m taking 43% of my budget to Twitter.

At some point, large pages with hundreds of thousands of followers will build their audiences on other platforms.  They will go where their voices will be heard.  Their followers will do what they do best, follow.  They’ll follow them right off your platform.

Guess what will happen to their friends, they will start spending more time on other platforms as well.

In the end, it all means less audience for people that are most important to Facebook: Their Advertisers.

Facebook dominates online time use more than any other platform.  Along with Google, they control 80% of online traffic.  If you no longer use Facebook or Google, that means they lose tons of data.  They can no longer target you with ads or monopolize your attention span.

Their goal is to keep you spending as much time on their network as possible.  It’s where you get your news, stay connected with friends, follow your favorite celebrities and more.  So what happens if you just up and walked away?

The $2 Billion Gamble

Facebook’s opinion about your opinion seems more important than your value as a customer.  Unfortunately, this doesn’t seem to be the case based on their actions.  Your opinion is so dangerous to them that they would rather risk losing you as a customer than respect that you think differently than they do.

Silencing you is more important than the money you bring that pays the people they employ to discriminate against you.

 

With no viable competitor to Facebook, they basically hold the keys to the city.  Unless you want to lose contact with everyone you know, you’re not going anywhere.  Or at least that’s what they think.

With each passing day, their users become more frustrated and angry.  Their frustration then motivates them to find alternatives.

Users are so desperate for an alternative that Donald Trump Jr is offering the king of social media followers as an incentive to developers. Will it be enough?

Only time can tell but one thing I know for sure is that most people don’t trust Facebook or Twitter.  Their double-standards are digging their own grave and all it will take is one reasonable alternative to come along.

You may not value our opinions, Facebook, but you will value the $2 billion we take with us when we leave you for good.

Social Justice Warriors: Their Own Worst Enemy

Social Justice Warriors: The Birth

Obama was responsible for resurrecting a dying issue of race relations in this country.  Prior to his 2007 Presidential campaign, no accused anyone else of being a racist.  Well, not unless you ACTUALLY said the N-word or something awful like that.  With the election of one Barack Hussein Obama, a new type of warrior was born.  Social Justice Warriors.

Social Justice Warrior DefinitionYes, these Social Justice Warriors were born because anyone who opposed candidate Obama was obviously a racist. 

This set a new standard for behavior amongst Democrats.  This election opened the floodgates for accusatory and inflammatory behavior.

Since Democrats are now the bully, Obama was the principal who signed their permission slip to wreak havoc in the halls.

The divisive behavior grew like a weed.  Instead of the gardener plucking them, he watered them and gave them sunlight.  This gardener chose to pluck, poison and starve the flowers and fruits of the garden.

 

Social Justice Warriors: The Progression

Obviously, the tactics of Social Justice Warriors worked.  They elected the first black president. Twice.

What else can we accomplish with guilt, accusations, and harassment?

Virtually anything, really.  Anyone can be a racist, sexist, homophobe, xenophone and bigot in the right light.

So that is exactly what they did.  With their new marching orders, they went searching for anyone they didn’t agree with and proceeded to put their head on the PC pike.

When one of their own gets fired or denied positions, they cry **insert “ist” term here**.  However, when one of their own lashes out and crosses the line; well that’s freedom of speech.  We all remember the Fresno State professor who openly celebrated the passing of Barbara Bush on Twitter.

She didn’t get fired or even disciplined for her extremely derogatory remarks.

As a result, she raised her speaking fee.  Turns out the beast is actually a vile goose that lays golden eggs of hate.  Good job, Fresno State.

Clearly, these tactics prove to work time and time again.  Many have fallen to the cry of social justice warriors which has only emboldened them further.

Social Justice Warriors: They’ve Poisoned Their Own Well

By 2016 the majority of Americans are sick of being accused of racism and every other “ism” thrown at us.

The left has gone so far left (and keeps going) that they have to come up with new ways to accuse people.  New pronouns are made up daily.  Literally, everything is racist or sexist.  Their fight for tolerance has pushed them into intolerance of everyone who doesn’t completely agree with their new brand of insanity.

Now, babies shouldn’t be assigned a gender at birth.  Well, there are no genders according to the left.  Assuming someone’s gender is a violent crime that will not be forgiven.

A new California bill will mandate women seats on the boards of corporations regardless of merit.  Clearly, Hillary lost the election because of misogyny.  It had nothing to do with the fact that is so awful, people would rather elect a complete outsider over her. (Thanks Hillary!)

For social justice warriors, there is no end to the fight.

Social Justice Warriors: Destroying Their Own Mission

Saying everyone is special is just a nice way of saying no one is.

If everyone is a racist, then no one is.  By throwing accusations at everyone, the accusation itself loses meaning.

We are at a point in our society when a liberal throws an accusation, everyone collectively rolls their eyes and says “Of course they are”.

Social Justice Warrior

Almost on cue, a leftist will throw in the race/sex/orientation/bigot card as if they are reading from a script of hate when they are in an argument.  By responding with this rather than an intelligent response, it further proves they have nothing of substance.

They must rely on guilt to win an argument.

Sadly for them, it’s not working anymore.  Social just warriors have become their own worse enemy.  By not knowing when to quit, they have essentially diluted their message to a point that people have completely stopped paying attention.

Instead, they whine and complain to one another since no one else has any interest in what they have to say anymore.  And now, they have lost their targets of accusations so guess what happens next; they turn on each other.

I personally am very much looking forward to the day that they get sick of one another and fade off into obscurity.

Until then, we do what any reasonable adult does with petulant toddlers; we ignore them.

Why Do So Many Jews Vote Democrat?

So Why Do So Many Jews Vote Democrat?

Democrats and liberals are becoming increasingly Pro-Palestine and Anti-Israel.  They believe that Israel is an illegitimate state and Benjamin Netanyahu is a war criminal.  Several prominent Democrats such as Bernie Sanders (who claims he is Jewish by the way) have criticized Israel in recent statements.  So to understand why so many Jews vote Democrat, I interviewed Jewish Closet on the Right member, Cody Hug.

Why do you feel so many Jewish people vote Democrat when the Party is almost entirely Pro-Palestine/Anti-Israel?

Fake Jew Bernie SandersThe people who vote Democrat and adhere to liberal views are mainly Jewish people that are secular or non-practicing Jews.  The more secular they are, the more liberal they will be.-Cody Hug

sec·u·lar:  not subject to or bound by religious rule; not belonging to or living in a monastic or other order (non-practicing Jew)

However, Cody states that many Jews who emigrated here in the 1920’s were coming from predominantly socialist countries.  Therefore, bringing a more left-leaning base of ideology with them. He also points out that many Jews, even today don’t fully understand what socialism is all about.

Case in point, Nazi Germany which was literally founded by the National Socialist German Workers’ Party of Adolf Hitler.  We all know how that ended.

What about practicing Jews though?

On the other side of the coin, Orthodox Jews (and other jews who are practicing and adhere to Judaism) are very much conservative.

Now, when we discuss Orthodox Jews, Cody made it clear that this did not mean they support a political party or even have an interest in politics.  It just means they study the Torah, Tanakh, and Talmud, which are the Jewish Holy Books. These books teach very conservative principles, especially on social issues.

Example: The books believe in the sanctity of life which translates into a very pro-life stance in the Republican vs. Democrat debate.

Furthermore, the scriptures teach to love Israel and their people.  The only “side” that does this is the right.  Therefore, the more secular you are, the less pro-Israel you become.

It’s sad to say, but many people who are leftists and liberals who claim their Jewish identiy as somehow a reason to why their views are correct, are simply hijacking the Jewish faith and using it as a bait and switch.

Being that Cody grew up a Democrat and eventually joined the #WalkAway Campaign, my next question was naturally:

When did you realize the Democratic Party wasn’t right for you?

Cody’s path to Conservatism started around the age of 13.  However, it was several significant events that shaped the way he sees the world today.

NJROTC Cadets

  1. He enrolled in NJROTC in High School which instilled a strong sense of patriotism in him and taught him a lot about American History. (Why is it that those two factors almost ALWAYS make someone a Conservative? Has anyone else noticed?)
  2. Working in the entertainment industry, Cody learned very quickly that the left was very intolerant.  They demand that you believe exactly as they do. Anything that deviates from the norm is unacceptable and will be punished (usually by public mockery).  He found that “closeted conservatives” were rather pleasant to be around.  This shocked him as he was indoctrinated to believe they are the enemy.
  3. Ultimately, growing his faith led him to a path of conservatism.  By becoming more in-tune with his spiritual studies, the progression became organic in nature.

Clearly, the high-profile, liberal Jews of the Democratic party do not represent the true Jewish culture AT ALL.

Let’s keep moving though because I feel like we’re all learning a lot here.

How does the Jewish Community feel about topics like gun control and other issues?

I was surprised to discover that many welfare programs are strongly supported by those in the Jewish community.  The main reason is that Jews are very community oriented and feel it is their duty to ensure everyone is taken care of.

Jews are very dedicated to community involvement and volunteering in charities.

So in many ways, this is a big factor when considering how to vote and may explain a lot.  It also explains why they tend to support more socialist platforms because on the surface, they sound great.

Jews Voting Democrat Lead to Their Near Extermination

Issues like gun control, however, are not quite as simple to pinpoint.  Many who study the Talmudic teachings opt out of gun ownership because this scripture mandates Jews are to avoid unnecessary danger.

However, the Talmudic teachings also say:

If someone comes to kill you, rise up and kill him first. -Talmudic Scripture

On the flip side, Jews have been the target for violent religious persecution for thousands of years.  Obviously, when a community cannot defend itself, it is much easier to exterminate and control.

Hopefully, many Jews have learned to embrace a more proactive approach to preventing history from repeating itself.

 

Conclusion

The political history of the Jewish people is an extremely complex and difficult issue to cover in one article. We could spend weeks if not months trying to unpack the history and details of one the world’s oldest religions.  However, it doesn’t take a genius to figure out the left has repeatedly betrayed the Jewish community.

Based on what we’ve learned here, it’s clear to see why there are stark differences in ideology.  Those committed to their faith and implementing it in their lives are far more aligned with conservatives.  Ben Shapiro, for example, is a prominent Conservative and is also an Orthodox Jew.

Secular Jews which carry only the name and none of the actual beliefs, remind me quite of bit of what they call a “RINO” or Republican in name Only.  They may claim the name, but it is merely a title and nothing more.

I don’t think it would be too much of a stretch to consider secular, liberal Jews a threat to the Jewish community.

Their pro-Palestinian stance is very antisemitic at its core.  The gun control legislation they push in modern times is the same legislation that helped the Nazis round everyone up into concentration camps.  The socialism they advocate is the same snake oil sold to the people of Germany.

So my question to the Jewish community is, how much longer will you continue to support a party that does not care about your communities?  A party with candidates that claim to be one of you, only to turn their backs on you for political gain?  This party that pushes for the same legislation that lead to a near extermination of your people less than 100 years ago?

They have taken your votes for granted for too long.  Reaped the benefits of your loyalty only to turn their backs on you.

It’s time to #WalkAway.

 

Mollie Tibbetts

Mollie Tibbetts: Would She Approve of Politicizing Her Death?

On Tuesday, August 21st, 2018, Mollie Tibbett’s missing person case ended in the worst possible way.  Her father, Rob Tibbetts confirmed that the body of the young woman found in Iowa was in fact, Mollie.

Her alleged killer, Christian Behana Rivera, was in this country illegally.  His employer, Yarrabee Farms confirmed today that they did complete background checks prior to employing Rivera.

However,  that the documentation he provided, did not, in fact, belong to him.

Upon learning this information, the politicizing of Mollie Tibbett’s death became the main focus for conservatives and Republicans all the way up to 45 himself.

This horrific event is more proof in a very long list of events that could have been prevented if America would strengthen its borders.  Blocking illegal immigrants from entering our country would have a clear impact on reducing crime.

Democrats are actively deflecting the fact that Mollie’s killer was in the country illegally. Obviously, it only damages their case for open borders and abolishing ICE. Senator Elizabeth Warren redirected a question yesterday about Rivera to the fact that children were being separated at the border.

Much of the focus has now shifted to Mollie’s killer.  The political firestorm surrounding Rivera is overshadowing who Mollie is as a person.  Instead, she becomes the new face of political arguments that will be used as irrefutable evidence of necessary change.

Mollie’s voice has been taken from her.  She cannot speak for herself anymore.  So I went on a search to learn more about Mollie Tibbetts to answer a nagging question in my mind:

Would Mollie Tibbetts Be OK with Politicizing Her Death?

To learn more about Mollie, I went to the most obvious place to learn more about a twenty-year-old college student. Twitter.

It didn’t take me long to discover that she was definitely not a fan of President Trump and was an outspoken Democrat.  Many of her posts focus on mental health and women’s health.  She was a Planned Parenthood advocate and was not shy to engage with conservatives in all the ways she viewed them as wrong.

Aside from the social issues she was passionate about, Mollie seems like she was a normal, bubbly young girl.  She loved her friends and told them often. Her day to day life was filled with the normal college student obstacles.  She was very open about her struggles with insecurity and mental health.  Her battle with her body image was a huge struggle in her life.  Perhaps it was what influenced her choice in major?

Immigration and other social issues didn’t seem to be important to her, though.  In my quest to get to know Mollie better, I stumbled on a few tweets that might give a clue to how she felt about it.

Now, before anyone goes all judge and jury, let me just say that this tweet does not in any way justify what happened to her.  No one and I mean NO ONE deserves to lose their life because of a tweet, comment, political opinion or otherwise.  The only reason I have included this tweet is to gain a better understanding of Mollie as a person.

Based on what limited knowledge of Mollie we have, I think it would be safe to say that Mollie would not approve of being the new poster girl for Immigration Reform.  In addition to this, her family is fighting back against it.

Mollie’s Family Takes on Conservatives

This has been a rough week for the Tibbetts family.  The search for her carried on for weeks and the outcome was everyone’s worst fear.

Since the media firestorm is now in overdrive, many of her family members are pushing back against the conservatives stating the obvious.

Please remember, Evil Comes in All Colors.- Billie Jo Calderwood, Mollie’s Aunt

As you can see, Mollie’s family is not ok with anyone using her name for a political change.  I think it’s safe to say that if Mollie were still alive and the victim was someone else, she would feel the same way.  We don’t know this for sure, obviously but the signs point to such.

This leads me to my next question:

Should A Victim Be Used to Prove a Political Point, Even if They Themselves Would Not Approve?

I’m curious to see the community reactions on this topic.

In one hand, the parallel between Mollie’s killer, Kate Steinle’s Killer and other violent criminals who are also illegals cannot be ignored.

So despite the family’s objections, is the cause greater than their cries against it?  Without indisputable evidence, can change really take place?  Is preventing more crimes like this more important than respecting the family’s wishes?

I’m not sure.

Mollie was an in intelligent, passionate young girl full of hope.  Her future was bright.

I know that change needs to happen.  We need better border security despite the left’s cries that doing so is a violation of human rights.

What I can’t seem to get past is:

Is being a catalyst for change more important than truly remembering what Mollie Tibbetts stood for and believed in her own life?

Please let me know your thoughts in the comments and come join the conversation on Facebook!

 

1 2 3